At least we know it was an intentional difference:
http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2008-04/061603.html
For extended would it be possible to exclude cyclone pow~ from the library, or less drastically patch both cyclone and vanilla pow~ to throw a warning, as was discussed last april?
Matt
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 4:24 AM, Frank Barknecht fbar@footils.org wrote:
Hallo, Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Gem cyclone zexy creb cxc iemlib list-abs mapping markex maxlib memento mjlib motex oscx pddp pdogg pixeltango pmpd rradical sigpack smlib toxy unauthorized vbap pan freeverb hcs jmmmp ext13 ggee iem_anything flib ekext flatspace pdp pidip
I think it should be something like:
cyclone zexy creb iemlib ggee iem_anything flatspace
Uhm: list-abs?
A little problem is coming up with cyclone: Its [pow~] is different from the new builtin [pow~] in 0.42 (reversed inlets). What should we do about that?
Ciao
Frank Barknecht Do You RjDj.me? _ ______footils.org__
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev