Also, let me know if I should submit patches like this to the patch tracker. I figured I’d ask for feedback and take a couple stabs at it first here & on GitHub before adding any more noise to SF.
-------- Dan Wilcox @danomatika https://twitter.com/danomatika danomatika.com http://danomatika.com/ robotcowboy.com http://robotcowboy.com/
On Apr 1, 2016, at 2:36 AM, Dan Wilcox danomatika@gmail.com wrote:
Since no one is biting, I managed to fix most of the warnings by defining HAVE_ALLOCA_H and -Wno-parentheses in the Makefile.
Here’s a patch with the residuals:
- add default: break; for unhandled case statements
- change stddef.h include to stdlib.h for alloca() on BSD as per Tobias request
<warning_fixes3.patch>
Howdy all,
I put the proposed changes in the previous patches into a couple WIP branches on GH.
https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/11 https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/11 <https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/11 https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/11>
https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/12 https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/12 <https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/12 https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/12>
Dan Wilcox @danomatika https://twitter.com/danomatika danomatika.com http://danomatika.com/ robotcowboy.com http://robotcowboy.com/