29 Apr
2022
29 Apr
'22
4:27 p.m.
On Fri, 2022-04-29 at 14:02 +0200, Dan Wilcox wrote:
It was not a decision taken lightly,
That's what I thought.
but it's necessary as Pd's previous "error()" could conflict with libc "error()". The replacement already existed for sometime, so changing calls to "error(...)" with "pd_error(0, ...)" should be equivalent and not break the external in old versions of Pd.
So, if the pointer to the object (x) is not available, I can simply set it to 0 (or NULL)? Forgive my noobish question, but Pd doesn't crash when I call that function this way?
Roman