On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 10:58:12PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Aug 16, 2009, at 10:46 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Sun, 16 Aug 2009, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
So there has been a revived discussion of adding "tooltip" support to inlets/outlets, based on GÃŒnter's old patch. I think we should open up the discussion again to see if we can come up with a solution that Miller would accept. I believe his original objection was based on the fact that the patch added a record to the t_class struct. So I was thinking that instead of storing the tooltip data in t_class, it could be stored using a custom struct like t_inletdescription that was then added to object's class.
so the new objection will be based on the fact that the patch added a record to the t_class struct?... i mean, this struct doesn't make any difference with the original objection.
Do you have a record of the original objection? I am just operating on memory.
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=1056914&group_id=55736&atid=478072
------------------- http://mccormick.cx