23 Feb
2015
23 Feb
'15
9:21 a.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
On 2015-02-22 17:10, Martin Peach wrote:
There is already a t_int in Pd, it just isn't used.
the "t_int" type *is* used quite a lot: it is the type to be passed and returned tp/from the DSP perform callback.
i'm not sure whether using it as a 32bnit integer is actually "abuse".
fgmdsr IOhannes
(i totally agree that "t_int" is a horrid name for that type; it really should is a (void*) type and should have a proper name; but there you go).
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=ZjJ+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----