Hallo,
On May 23, 2008, at 9:48 PM, Miller Puckette wrote:
Or, how about three extra outlets to samplerate~ (so as not to have to add more to the top-level namespace)
Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Hmm, while the idea of a single object is good, I think the object is clearly called "samplerate" so getting the rest of that info from it doesn't really make sense.
I agree with Hans (except for the top-posting reply style) and would like to add that instead of separate outlets, maybe a single outlet would be better, that spits out messages prefixed with "blocksize N", "overlap M", "samplerate O" would be better as it could be extended with other messages later. Notice that I included "samplerate" here: such an object could be a general info object for the dsp state ([dspinfo~]?)
Ciao