On Dec 14, 2006, at 3:25 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
Of course, I'm not a developer, but I think that this is a smart way to go. Especially interchangeability of GUI components. Who knows when a nice, new version of a given object may be forged by a rogue programmer to be easily dropped into place...
It's not like it's impossible to overwrite methods in [objectmaker]. If someone had wanted to change the IEMGUIs, they would've done it already. This suggestion doesn't stem from need. I don't think that this "who knows" is backed by likelihood. If a rogue programmer would please stand up now, we might have a reason...
What is [objectmaker]?
As the author of the only modified version of IEMGUI in five years, I say no, we don't need this to happen.
It wasn't a question of need. We are all fed ;). Do you have any actual objections?
.hc
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju | Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada_______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have the audacity to believe that peoples everywhere can have three meals a day for their bodies, education and culture for their minds, and dignity, equality and freedom for their spirits. - Martin Luther King, Jr.