On Jan 30, 2008, at 10:37 PM, Chris McCormick wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 11:12:13AM +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
if this is ok for everybody, we will just do it.
I'm all for it.
Yay, me too!
(waiting for someone to say "...but what about Git/Bazaar/ Mercurial?...")
Chris.
Actually, wait, I just wrote a new SCM program in Pd! We must use it!
:-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :- D :-D
I am all for it. Thanks for taking this on! The plan sounds good. The only thing I am unclear about is the trunk/tags/branches layout. Are you still following your (IOhannes) idea that calls for a flat hierarchy? I think that's a good idea.
http://puredata.info/Members/zmoelnig/pdcon07/SubVersion
/pure-data/trunk/abstractions /pure-data/trunk/pd /pure-data/trunk/externals etc.
As for keeping things neat, I think that asterisk has a nice layout (but this can be decided and changed later, right?):
http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk/
/asterisk/branches/ (only versioned branches, i.e. 0.39, 0.40, 0.41) /asterisk/tags/ (only versioned tags, i.e. 0.39.1, 0.39.2, 0.39.3) /asterisk/team (folder for each developer's branches/tags) /asterisk/trunk (the whole thing)
.hc
------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----
kill your television