Tim Blechmann wrote:
hi miller, hi devs ...
the current implementation of rsqrt~ is most likely broken. i was sshing to carmen's amd64 machine ... looked like that filling the lookup table isn't really working ...
hmm, it seems that my 32bit and my 64bit machines are producing the same results when using [rsqrt~]
so why do you think that it is broken ? do you have a test patch exhibiting wrong behaviour ?
mfg.a.dsr IOhannes