On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 10:06:09AM +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
On 2018-06-23 21:35, Miller Puckette wrote:
OK... I need to fix a few bugs and quirks and put out a nice stable 0.48-2 - I'll pull teh original one for that and hold off on more-toward-double-precision for 0.49.
one more thing: it seems that you haven't really included the PD_LONGINTTYPE patch yet (which is really towards compiling (a single-precision Pd) for win64 rather than about double-precision).
Sure enough... I had somehow pulled it but not merged it, shouhd be fixed now.
M
this might be because i confused everybody with my "update/0.48-2" branch advertisment.
just for the record: i usually close the PRs that i include in the "update/0.xx" branch, so they don't show up on the list of active PRs any more. if i don't close them for whatever reason, then at least i leave a comment that the PR is included.
fgmasdr IOhannes
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@lists.iem.at https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev