Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I am glad the .pd issue worked out easily.
I just thought of one thing. The "pd-bar.pd" compatibility binding for [foo/bar] might not be the best thing to have. If you had [foo/bar] and [bar], you would not be able to insure that you are independently sending messages to [bar] with the symbol "pd-bar.pd" since both [foo/bar] and [bar] would listen to pd-bar.pd.
I vote for clean implementation over backwards compatibility. (it is still pd 0.* 8-)
i totally agree
(however, i didn't dare to do it)
i have added a note to the sf-tracker, so that whenever miller (or someone else) considers incorporating the patch, they should give the compatibility issue a quick thought. removing the compatibility binding is mainly deleting 2 consecutive lines (and modifying the 3rd), so it is fairly simple.
mfg.asdr IOhannes