4 Oct
2007
4 Oct
'07
6:50 p.m.
On 04/10/2007, at 5:37 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
chris clepper wrote:
I uncommented it which is the correct behavior compared to the original recordQT object.
i don't know why it has been removed. however, why don't we just use a separate outlet (or a different message) to indicate the end of recording? i am not a very big fan of ambigous messages...
I do not think that the frameNumber 0 is an ambiguous message in this case.
However I think that an output telling us the state of the object might be useful. But perhaps it is just an over-featuring.
chrz, tim