19 Feb
2009
19 Feb
'09
4:22 p.m.
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
yesterday when i went home i was wondering about (i guess) the same thing: could sending [foo bar( to [unpack s s] be actually considered a bug in the patch (for sending a non-list to [unpack]) and "unpack" itself (for accepting non-lists)?
with a circuit-bending attitude and without a spec, features and bugs often can't be told apart.
the help-patch clearly speaks of "lists of atoms", but doesn't mention other messages at all.
So why does the pd source spend 12 lines defining pack_anything ?
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal, Québec