25 May
2008
25 May
'08
10:23 p.m.
Hallo, Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On May 25, 2008, at 5:29 PM, zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
Quoting Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@eds.org:
i think the [r pd][route dsp] approach is a kludge...
Maybe this:
[dsp( | [s pd]
[r pd] | [route dsp]
exactly this is the kind of "kludge" i am talking about. i hope that "kludge" means something really bad and ugly, as this is how i use this word here.
You mean it's a kludge if there isn't a special object for this?
The real problem is that it's global: I may not want all my [r pd] receivers to get activated every time something somewhere queries the state of DSP.
Ciao
--
Frank Barknecht