I don't think there's any such object, at least not in the Pd distribution. But sig~ has to stay around now for compatibility with old patches. Also, if you happen to be using the same scalar value in several inlets, it's more efficient on most machines to have a single sig~ and fan its output to all the inputs.
cheers Miller
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 06:50:11PM +0200, Philip Stolz wrote:
Hello, can someone answer the following question: Is there a real case in which a "sig~" module is needed to do a message-audio conversion? When I tried to find a simple example showing that message- and audio signals are distinguished, I found out that every audio processing module (e.g. "*~", "+~", "-~" ...) also accepts message signals.
Regards, Phil.
PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.kug.ac.at http://iem.kug.ac.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-dev