Hmm, and on that subject, I'm making changes in garray for 0.39 that might point to a different approach to using arrays in DSP, not sure yet. I'm trying to unify "regular" (named) arrays with the ones that can appear in "scalars"... which is in turn necessary for me to make any more progress on the "data" aspect of Pd...
cheers Miller
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 02:52:00PM +0100, Tim Blechmann wrote:
Maintaing the simd improvements apart is a viable solution too, if you can separate them enough that they can be activated by a configuration setting they should not get into the way of normal operation.
hmm ... it should be possible to do that ... i mean ... i should be able to add a runtime flag to the runtime cpu detection ...
on the other hand, the code simd instructions, the vectoralignment and the threadlock for garrays it hard to split appart...
cheers ... tim
-- mailto:TimBlechmann@gmx.de ICQ: 96771783 http://www.mokabar.tk
After one look at this planet any visitor from outer space would say "I want to see the manager." William S. Burroughs
PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://iem.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-dev