14 Feb
2006
14 Feb
'06
8:31 p.m.
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
one guy thinks that atan2 is unary but that +,-,* are binary. so what?
wow. it seems like i really made it into (another) flame war.
Instead of arguing about this, what about using expr to do atan2? It accepts a bang as shown in attached patch and is more readable anyway IMO.
You could do it the tcl way and use expr for every non-symbol operation. Would there be any difference in speed doing this?
Martin