Does anyone have a good scheme for achieving GEM rendering in a separate thread without: - too much recoding - too much synchronisation overhead - losing expected PD object behaviour ?
I've thought about it a little and haven't figured out an elegant scheme yet. Certainly keeping the rendering in a separate thread looks like it would make things easier.
Daniel
-----Original Message----- From: pd-dev-admin@iem.kug.ac.at [mailto:pd-dev-admin@iem.kug.ac.at]On Behalf Of guenter geiger Sent: Tuesday, 19 November 2002 6:45 AM To: IOhannes zmoelnig Cc: Daniel Heckenberg; chris clepper; PD-dev@iem.kug.ac.at Subject: Re: [PD-dev] Gem CVS Bug (wrong alarm ??)
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, IOhannes zmoelnig wrote:
i see daniel's suggestion of making Gem a second thread, but this would have been easier with the hardwired DAG
Exactly what I thought too, when I read that proposal, but it would be great having both.
Guetner
PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.kug.ac.at http://iem.kug.ac.at/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pd-dev