Ben Bogart wrote:
This makes a lot of sense to me in the long run.
Mark, why was markEx merged into Gem originally?
(being not Mark, but i think:) because it was easier: some of the example-patches depend on markEX, and it would have been very complicated if you had to get another library. But of course: markEX is not really Gem, and it certainly makes sense to put it into some separated space (like the CVS, although i don't think, lot's of people will continue development for markEX (?)) But then: should i remove markEX from Gem ? (again the problem with the help-patches)
mfg.ad.r IOhannes