I wonder what the best approach is to getting it included. I also think its a very valuable contribution. I think we need to first get the Tcl/Tk only changes done, since that was the mandate of the pd- devel 0.41 effort. Then once Miller has accepted those changes, then we can start with the C modifications there. So how to proceed next, I think is based on how eager you are, Bryan, to getting this in a regular build.
One option is making a pd-devel-utf8 branch, another is posting these patches to the patch tracker and waiting for Miller to make his next update with the Pd-devel Tcl-Tk code.
Maybe we can get Miller to chime in on this topic.
.hc
On Mar 13, 2009, at 12:00 AM, dmotd wrote:
hey bryan,
just a quick note of a appreciation for getting this one out.. i hope it gets picked up in millers build soon.. a very useful and necessary modification.
well done!
dmotd
On Thursday 12 March 2009 08:07:50 Bryan Jurish wrote:
moin folks,
I believe I've finally got pd-devel 0.41-4 using UTF-8 across the board. So far, I've tested message boxes & comments (g_rtext), as well as symbol atoms, and all seems good. I think we can still expect goofiness if someone names an abstraction using a multibyte character when the filesystem isn't UTF-8 encoded (raw 8-bit works for me here too), but I really don't want to open that particular can of worms.
So I guess I have 2 questions:
(1) what should I call the generic UTF-8 source files? (see my other post)
(2) shall I commit these changes to pd-devel/0.41-4, or somewhere else, or just post a diff (ca. 33k, ought to be easier to read now; I've tried to follow the indentation conventions of the source files I modified)?
marmosets, Bryan
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using ReBirth is like trying to play an 808 with a long stick. - David Zicarelli