On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 12:30:01PM -0500, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, Chris McCormick wrote:
I shouldn't even have to justify my own preference for running pd-vanilla to you,
Well, why are you replying to me? That's because you think it's worth it.
Excellent point, sir!
Thanks for all your lovely long essays. I'm sure they contained many important points, but I'm sorry I don't have time to read or respond to them all. Which is the same reason that this:
"Even though pd-extended is built as one set of things, there's nothing that prevents you from designing a scheme of .deb files that cuts that one set of binaries (made from a single "make" command) into a conveniently-compartmentalised system designed so that each package doesn't pull in too many other packages at once (recursively speaking)."
is 100% irrelevant to me, and quite a ridiculous solution to the problem I raised.
I'll continue to `apt-get install puredata` for as long as I can.
Back to work.
Have a nice day,
Chris.
------------------- http://mccormick.cx