IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
i think assuming "scons" to be the more uptodate build system just because it is younger than scons is misleading.
oops, of course the 2nd "scons" should be replaced by "make".
i just wanted to say that: "autoconf+make" is older than "scons" (as programs), but this doesn't mean that scons would work any better, esp. if the build-scripts are not actively maintained.
mfa.,dsr. IOhannes