Re: [PD-dev] missing file from pd-MAIN and fftw version

and that is the question: why do we necessarily need the fftw based fft-objects in plain pd and cannot use externals?

so the only drawback is see is: the objects are called [fftw~] instead of [fft~]; but lo and behold, i vaguely remembered krzysztof magic in cyclone, where a newly loaded class raises itself over an already existing class. while he is using it to overwrite objects from other externals (e.g. iemmatrix's [matrix~]), i don't see any reason why this should not work with internals.

et voila, does this not sound good?

sounds good. maybe there should be some official policy on the overloading of internals?

mfg.adsr IOhannes

---

PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev