On Sat, 14 Jan 2006, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
abstractions require the .pd extension. with the 2nd patch i submitted a ".pd" is appended to the canvas-receiver of an _abstraction_. the "new" (currently: additional, but see the other mails on this topic) canvas-receiver consists of the classname (== relative-pathname + filename). there is no check whether the classname (how you call the object) contains a relative (or even absolute) pathname.
What's the use of being able to contact one (and only one) instance of an abstraction via a receive-symbol?
How do I know which instance I am contacting?
And then, why is [namecanvas] marked as obsolete?
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju | Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada