On Jul 25, 2005, at 11:27 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
and since there are some parallels between message-$-args and object-$-args, having a "$@" would also mean that you could have argument-lists of arbitrary length in abstractions in abstractions. [l $1 $2 $3 $4 $5] is not the same as [l $@].
Now *THAT* would be mighty cool. I'm quite fond of IEM's [dollarg] already.
Yes, this would be really good. It would be nice to have that flexibility. It would make it much easier to build more complicated objects in Pd.
.hc
________________________________________________________________________ ____
"If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession of everyone, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it."
- Thomas Jefferson