On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 15:26 -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
This looks very cool, we need an easy to use OSC replacement for dumpOSC/sendOSC. One thing, I get this when I load them:
i am afraid, that they do not make it easier for the user to use mrpeach/osc. at the least the goal was to make [tcpserver] work at all for OSC transportation. [tcpsocketserver] is supposed to be used the same way as one would use [tcpserver]. as IOhannes already mentioned, the problem is, that TCP is a stream-based protocol and packet-agnostic, whereas OSC is a packet based protocol and wants packets to be received exactly the same way as they were sent. [tcpserver] - since it talks plain TCP - cannot guarantee that.
we need an easy to use OSC replacement for dumpOSC/sendOSC.
do you mean, it would make sense to have something 'abstracted out', that does OSC un/packing and transport in a single class? i could try, if i get clear picture of how it should be done.
unpackOSCstream ... couldn't create unpackOSCstream ... couldn't create packOSCstream ... couldn't create packOSCstream ... couldn't create
I can't find those anywhere.
yo, as others already pointed out, those are part of svn in mrpeach.
roman
___________________________________________________________ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de