Hallo, IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
btw, this has been fixed in Gem some time ago (at least it should!)
I admit that I didn't check. (Actually I can't check, as currently for me every "destroy" crashes Pd.)
however, i don't think it is a valid assumption for pd itself. in this case, i would highly prefer an error-message to the console (an "exception") and no destruction at all. (since usually you have more complex settings when doing dynamic patching, e.g. [clear, obj 0 0 inlet, obj 0 100 outlet, connect 0 0 1 0( )
"clear" alone may be fine in this case, but I suppose things get hairy if you just delete a some objects using e.g. "find foo, cut", and then create some new ones and try to connect them. Wouldn't the numbering of objects necessary for [connect ...( be invalid now, too? At least the bookkeeping would get even more difficult than it already is.
Ciao