Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I have no problem with whatever setup you want to run. My problem is
most likely i am a bit over-sensitive in this region.
that you block progress expecting the rest of us to implement things for your very specific setup. If you would do the work and come up with a solution that works for all of us, then it would be a different story.
oh now that sounds great (but i guess, i was just too aggressive to get a cool answer ,-))
since you were talking about "getting a clean solution", i thought we were at the stage of _talking_ about things _before_ implementing them. maybe i was wrong. i apologize in this case.
i would prefer pd-dev not to become a "hey, i have implemented feature xyz" kind of list, with loads of people getting frustrated since neither feature x nor y (not to speak of z) are accepted into pd-core. that is why i thought, that the main purpose of pd-dev is talking about development (but then there is also the irc-chat, which might have this purpose)
mfg.asdr. IOhannes