On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, David Plans Casal wrote:
On 13 Sep 2006, at 03:02, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
So for now, I guess we should simply be able to "open" pd's internal developments to see some kind of Darwinism
Genetic evolution has more to do with monkeys on typewriters than about people wanting to make intelligent decisions. (Darwin knew this... even though typewriters didn't exist in his day)
Hold on. This seems to make an argument *for* closed code, and for pumpkin holding, and therefore, in favour of Miller's control. Are you feeling ok, Matthieu? ;-)
I'm opposing to the use of the word "Darwinism" in this context. I'm not making an argument in favour of a closed process, I'm making one against likening an open process to Darwinism, even "some kind of".
What you say seems to imply you believe that only Miller is intelligent? ;-)
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju | Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada