Em qui., 19 de jan. de 2023 às 05:04, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig@iem.at escreveu:
afaict the idea is to get rid of this abstraction altogether, and be able to just use [clone -di -s 1 dac~ 16]
yeah I guess it was pretty late and I was tired and I couldn't see how this could actually make [dac~] get arguments from the instance number. I was looking at the abstraction and had a hard time adapting to the new concept.
again, i don't see why we couldn't juse use [clone -x -d lop~ 500]
yup, forgot about the -x flag, so yeah, [clone] would cover both cases easily! Sorry I was thinking clearly and through. I am just rather hesitant in believing [clone] can actually solve all the problems without any modification :) and even now I am still insecure. But anyway, in the case we find something in the way and it needs modification, we could have a modified alternative with another name, that's all, but I guess I may eventually get confident it doesn't need anything new, let me think through and see ;)
thanks