On Aug 23, 2006, at 8:23 AM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I think you should reconsider. I think that we should try to make Pd more platform-native, which Miller's new prefs stuff is a step towards.
If you can't bother telling me why, then I don't know why I'd bother reconsidering.
Besides, note that Pd on Linux/BSD/etc uses the configuration system of neither GNOME nor KDE. Don't you mean that it should?
If you already know the intricacies of Mac OS X, for example, why should you have to learn some other random thing? Mac OS X and Debian illustrate this concept very clearly. In Debian _all_ packages are configured to fit in with the Debian paths and scripts. That means once you learn how to setup one Debian package, you can apply that knowledge to any other Debian package.
.hc
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem.