On Nov 10, 2007, at 1:12 PM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Nov 10, 2007, at 7:45 AM, Andy Farnell wrote:
This sounds interesting Hans. The question would be, what is the default/empty behaviour of Pd with no internals at all?
Does it just become a framework for connecting objects (the Pd way)?
Yeah, pretty much. It leads to the question, what are Pd's essential "reserved words"?
I consider the objects currently in Pd-core the essential ones, if alone for practical reasons. But also technically they are a good base selection.
Reserved words are different than essential functions. Here are the C reserved words:
http://lib.daemon.am/Books/C/apb/apb.htm
Try to write Pd without calloc, sprintf, etc. yet they are not reserved words.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reserved_word
.hc
------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----
"Free software means you control what your computer does. Non-free software means someone else controls that, and to some extent controls you." - Richard M. Stallman