Yes, but "windows" is also a generic term, which "darwin" and "linux" aren't. Perhaps "pd_microsoft", but that would be a 12-letter suffix!
M On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 02:03:24PM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
How about pd_windows? After all "darwin" and "linux" are full OS names, so it would be consistent.
pd_linux pd_darwin pd_windows
.hc
On Dec 20, 2005, at 1:21 PM, Miller Puckette wrote:
This is a good idea all around... I'd suggest "pd_msw", and to search for "pd_msw" extensions before falling back to ".dll". If you don't do it first I'll go on and code it here.
cheers Miller
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 01:12:57PM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Dec 20, 2005, at 12:36 PM, Thomas Grill wrote:
Hi all,
...is it impossible to use different postfix's on windows? Not that it'll help, but in Xcode it's called "executable extension", so maybe there's an option equally obscure on windoze?
i have always wondered why there is just .dll, and no .pd_win or .pd_nt or whatever, similar to pd_darwin. Just having done some short tests, doesn't seem to be a reason for that, as everything is working ok. Clearly the pd loader would have to be extended. To my mind, it's advantageous to be able to use both the native shared library extensions (like .so, .dylib, .dll) and custom pd ones. The former to easily use it with dynamic linking and the latter to resolve name clashes....
Make a diff and I'll included it in Pd-extended.
.hc
__ ____
Man has survived hitherto because he was too ignorant to know how to realize his wishes. Now that he can realize them, he must either change them, or perish. -William Carlos Williams
PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
http://at.or.at/hans/