as i'm preparing an updated Debian package for pd-osc, it would also be nice if you could bump the version-number to *0.2* in osc-meta.pd.
or do you prefer a date-based versioning scheme, like *0.1.20141108* ?
On 11/08/2014 02:41 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
** [bugs:#1168] packOSC: fix some build-warnings**
**Status:** open **Group:** v0.46 **Labels:** osc build **Created:** Sat Nov 08, 2014 01:41 PM UTC by IOhannes m zmölnig **Last Updated:** Sat Nov 08, 2014 01:41 PM UTC **Owner:** Martin Peach
the attached patch fixes a number of (minor) issues.
remove a number of unused variables (or move them into the `#ifdef block` where they are used)
cast to `unsigned int` before printing a `size_t` (and use `%u` rather than `%i`)
`t_int` should (despite it's name) only be used for the dsp-chain, not for generic integer types. use `int` instead; cf [pd-dev](http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/2014-06/019871.html)
Sent from sourceforge.net because pd-dev@lists.iem.at is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/pure-data/bugs/
To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/pure-data/admin/bugs/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@lists.iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev