On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
� wrote:
Hi,
I think there is no reason for thomas to fear (man cvs). The CVS is a
i do not know a way to explain fear. but i don't think "man cvs" will help. (nor does "man freedom")
place for collaboration, not a marketplace for externals. If Thomas
aren't there projects there that are already read-only for other devs ? why ? what makes tom schouten's approach better (sorry ts that i keep abusing your way of usage: no criticism intended): overwriting any changes made to the CVS via a daily cron-job ?
I think there is nothing better with tom shouten's approach. It is a great achievment having Thomas' code directly in CVS, but the way it is done could have been better.
Anyhow, who cares,
Guenter
doesn't want to collaborate, then why does he want to put his externals there ? Did you talk him into that, or is it his own decision ?
we talked him into that. we are currently restructuring development at the iem (this is: using collaborative development of projects with cvs-alike systems). we try to minimize administrative overhead: for us of course; but also for other people who obviously felt the need to put "iemlib" into the CVS (which i think was a good idea) and who now have to manually (or scripted or ...) sync it with the releases.
There is also no reason for his paranoia, obviously he did not understand what the purpose of the devel version of pd is.
i told him so
Since the existance of CVS there has not been a single case where we had problems.
i know
still, why should it not be possible for tm if it is possible ?
mfg.asd.r IOhannes