On May 29, 2007, at 4:47 AM, David Plans Casal wrote:
On 28 May 2007, at 20:36, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
What sort of contributions would be needed? I agree that the release cycle should be quicker, and would like to help in any way that I can.
Is there an itinerary or task list that contributors could refer to? I think if there was a bit more of a public plan/itinerary, things could be scaled to more contributors more easily.
I totally agree. It's hard to get a picture of outstanding tasks if you're not already in the thick of it, even if you look at the todo lists in there...
Are we supposed to use SF's tracker (bugs, features, patches, support) to track this? I think, as Kyle points out, even people like me (not experienced programmers/sysops/etc) would pitch in if there was a clearer roadmap.
I agree, a roadmap would be very useful. I'll try to contribute to such a thing when I get a chance. One method of contributing to Pd is to work on things that bug you, or that you want improved.
.hc
David
PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----
¡El pueblo unido jamás será vencido!