14 Jan
2006
14 Jan
'06
8:09 p.m.
Thomas Grill wrote:
Am 13.01.2006 um 20:40 schrieb IOhannes m zmoelnig:
now that is most likely even cooler than the abstraction-classname-binding...
please do some testing...
Today, when doing a workshop with some pd newcomers i was once more embarassed about the tricks i needed to use $0 inside a message. Since $0 is special anyway, is there a real reason for it?
do you mean, is there a reason for my patch, a reason for $0 or a reason for $0 being "different" in messages?
mfg.ad.r IOhannes