we hurry?
I think remove is not a solution although, if I'm not wrong, it seems will happen in the near future like all the others external libraries.
The fact that it is a useful tool and consolidated should be enough to respect the work done (pd-extended integration too) and its authors.
Everyone is free to be in accordance with the license, and then use it or not, keep or remove.
As has been said many times an informative text in its installation should be sufficient.
Witches were burned centuries ago, now we don't need.
Sergi.
[Santa] | \ [Laws] [Likifreaks]
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 9:14 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
On 2010-12-08 21:37, Xavier Miller wrote:
Hello, .
So, yes, please list ALL the licences which are included in PD/PD-extended, especially those that are not compatible with common Open Source / Free licences ! At least users need to know they use non-free parts of software, and use it being aware of it.
i head the impression, that we are not talking what is included in pd-extended here. instead we are talking about the source code hosted in the public "pure-data" repository at sourceforge. while Pd-extended includes most stuff from this repository and hardly anything else, the two are independent.
fgmasdr IOhannes
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev