Hallo, I'd personally greatly appreciate it if DD was kept in the pure-data project. For my own eventual contribution to DD, it would be far more convenient.
There's nothing in the SVN ethos that precludes multiple projects in one repository; I believe it's in fact the recommended configuration. It's simply a matter of organization.
As much as I support the use of SVN:externals as a handy tool, if given the choice it's optimal to just have everything in the same repository. I have a web startup which most definitely has many projects running concurrently in the same repository, as well as externals definitions for tracking other projects (and internal folders too), so I am speaking from experience in saying this.
Also, no one has to check out everything; often users will just check out a certain subdirectory of the repository that they're interested in.
Cheers Luke
On Feb 6, 2008 6:08 PM, Mathieu Bouchard matju@artengine.ca wrote:
Dear pd-dev,
Should DesireData remain part of the "pure-data" sf-project, or become a separate sf-project just like GEM already is?...
I ask because HCS seems quite concerned by the thought that DesireData might stay in the repository. He seems to claim that moving DesireData out of the repository, would be a way of collaborating with him.
What do you think?
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal QC Canada _______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev