geiger wrote:
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005, Miller Puckette wrote:
OK, I'm liking "pd_win32" more and more. If Microsoft makes a new dll format that permits bundling, that would be a good moment to change the suffix again...
pwersonally i would prefer "w32" instead of "win32", just to get rid of the competitive attitude ;-)
Which leads me to a question I always wanted to ask, but never dared to. What should be done on platforms that support more than one architecture, like linux or macosx ? Obvioulsy a xxx.pd_linux from a powerpc machine is not usable on a pentium, which makes bundling impossible. One would need a pd_linux_368, pd_linux_ppc, etc ...
true. i noticed very similar problems on my amd64 which is mostly use with 64bit linux but sometimes with the 32bit version of the same os. obviously i have xxx.pd_linux which cannot be opened by the "architecture" i am currently working on so i have to recompile.
mfg.asd.r IOhannes