Since DD is a fork, I think it should not be a branch of Pd in the repository. It can be in the same repository, I don't care either way about that. I think IOhannes proposed something like this (but maybe something else makes more sense?):
abstractions doc pd externals desiredata
I expected they would have wanted their own repository so that they can control it themselves without having to deal with the Pd overhead (adding devs, commit policy, etc). But I guess not.
.hc
On Feb 6, 2008, at 9:08 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Dear pd-dev,
Should DesireData remain part of the "pure-data" sf-project, or become a separate sf-project just like GEM already is?...
I ask because HCS seems quite concerned by the thought that DesireData might stay in the repository. He seems to claim that moving DesireData out of the repository, would be a way of collaborating with him.
What do you think?
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal QC Canada_______________________________________________ PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----
'You people have such restrictive dress for women,’ she said, hobbling away in three inch heels and panty hose to finish out another pink-collar temp pool day. - “Hijab Scene #2", by Mohja Kahf