What happens if it stays where it is? Does Sourceforge complain? Debian? Will it be detrimental to people's projects that use Pd? Will it impede Pd's development?
-Jonathan
--- On Wed, 12/8/10, Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@at.or.at wrote:
From: Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@at.or.at Subject: [PD-dev] removing non-free code from pure-data SVN To: "pd-dev List" pd-dev@iem.at Date: Wednesday, December 8, 2010, 9:10 PM
So we now have two non-free libraries included in the pure-data SVN: pidip and unauthorized. As far as I understand it, this is in violation of what SourceForge asks of projects, and also seems to me in violation of the developers on the pure-data SourceForge, since the rest of the code there uses free licenses (mostly GPL, BSD-like, and Tcl-like).
So the question is: should we remove pidip and unauthorized from the pure-data SVN?
.hc
News is what people want to keep hidden and everything else is publicity. - Bill Moyers
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev