Re: [PD-dev] snprintf vs. sprintf_s?

Miller Puckette wrote:

OTOH, I like the idea of just supplying a spoofed config.h - comes in at just the level of irony that's fitting in the situation.

That makes the most sense to me. I guess all of the source files could include "config.h", and config.h could be ...

#ifdef _MSC_VER #include "config_windows.h" #else #include "config_autoconf.h" #endif

and then change config.h.in to be config_autoconf.h.in, and change AC_CONFIG_HEADERS() in configure.in to point to config_autoconf.h.in, as well.

That way, you can have a hand made config_windows.h that include the logic for working with a non-GNU build environment, and we can still handle things automagically for other platforms.

-- Russell Bryant