seems we're ready to go, here's a small set of updates for the doc branch
https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2769
I just merged with master and also updated the manual version to 0.56-2
Em ter., 4 de nov. de 2025 às 11:00, Benjamin Wesch < benjamin.wesch@gmail.com> escreveu:
sounds right to me, too, for sure. if it doesn't even fix a regression, it's certainly better not to hurt performance. thanks for the tests on this! so it better remains a challenge for 0.57.
cheers, ben
On Tue, Nov 4, 2025, 14:26 Miller Puckette via Pd-dev pd-dev@lists.iem.at wrote:
OK, I'm convinced -- reverting 36d7be0e :)
M
On 11/4/25 2:16 PM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Tue, 2025-11-04 at 13:47 +0100, Miller Puckette via Pd-dev wrote:
Yep, that's what's happening to me as well - I can revert 36d7be0e but then the test patch misbehaves.
I now also checked 0.56-0, 0.55-0, 0.54-0 and the patch misbehaves in the same way.
As I see it:
36d7be0e fixes an issue - that is old and certainly not a regression of 0.56 - at huge performance penalty
All the GOP related regressions introduced since 0.56-0 are fixed in current master and are not relying on 36d7be0e
By principle of least surprise I'd vote for leaving 36d7be0e out in the upcoming minor release.
Roman
pd-dev@lists.iem.at - the Pd developers' mailinglist
https://lists.iem.at/hyperkitty/list/pd-dev@lists.iem.at/message/XZN5CLH27Y3...
pd-dev@lists.iem.at - the Pd developers' mailinglist
https://lists.iem.at/hyperkitty/list/pd-dev@lists.iem.at/message/SEUQYM3SC5G...
pd-dev@lists.iem.at - the Pd developers' mailinglist
https://lists.iem.at/hyperkitty/list/pd-dev@lists.iem.at/message/4JUO7GS5UOP...