23 Feb
2009
23 Feb
'09
2:32 a.m.
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I have found in my teaching that [trigger] is a fair more complex thing to understand than import. [trigger] has to be explained at length, often repeatly.
How much of it is because of the inherent complexity of [trigger], vs how much is because of how it ties in with execution order, the hot/cold inlets and the standard outlet order (right-to-left) ?
And then how much of the rest of trigger can be explained in terms of other things that may be already known? For example, [t b] is like a [t a] with a [bang].
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801, Montréal, Québec