Hallo, Andrew (Andy) W. Schmeder hat gesagt: // Andrew (Andy) W. Schmeder wrote:
Only the 'OSC-Kit' code is covered by that license (i.e. the OSC specification is still free).
One could easily use another implementation, e.g. Steve Harris's new liblo. (and it might be better code anyways - osckit did not strike me as being particularly robust, its more like an example than a production-ready library)
Well, it still would require a rewrite, which someone would have to do. It's would be easier if CNMAT would change the license. The talk about their code being "open source" on the website, which isn't correct with that licence.
ciao