On Nov 27, 2005, at 7:33 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Nov 27, 2005, at 6:27 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
btw i'm making efforts to "fix" warnings that i get with using "scons
I've fixed most of the rest. While doing that I also fixed a memory leak in [poly] and one in [bonk~].
Could you submit patches for these
All of those things, or just the memory leaks?
Well, anything you are willing to turn into a diff patch, really. The memory leaks sound the most pressing.
How should I submit those? Would those be copy+paste from the pd-cvs mailing-list, or should they be something else?
"cvs diff -uw" works well for me. diff -u allows the patch to fudge a bit with the line numbers.
If not pd-cvs, then what should I diff against? PureMSP 0.39 ?
The HEAD of pd MAIN in CVS.
That would ensure that they got into the main Pd source.
Well, no, it doesn't *ensure* that. No need to pretend it would.
Its a step in the right direction.
.hc
________________________________________________________________________ ____
"Information wants to be free." -Stewart Brand