----- Original Message -----
From: Thomas Mayer thomas@residuum.org To: pd-dev@iem.at Cc: Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2013 8:18 PM Subject: Re: [PD-dev] stackoverflow tag
OK, so here is the question (and the tag): http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14226869/how-to-keep-audio-and-video-gem-...
*Ping*
And your first reply suggests asking back here on the list!
*Pong*
But I'd imagine Pd-related questions of a more general nature would benefit from being asked to a wider audience like that.
-Jonathan
On 08.01.2013 23:05, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Anyone on Stack Overflow with more than 1500 reputation? If so, please
create
a "puredata" or "pd" tag, you need at least that many
points to be allowed to
do so.
http://stackoverflow.com/privileges/create-tags
The question is, I guess, should the official tag be 'puredata' so
we can beat
IBM to the punch, or 'pd'. I think 'puredata' is clearer.
.hc
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
-- "We left all that stuff out. If there's an error, we have this routine called panic, and when it is called, the machine crashes, and you holler down the hall, 'Hey, reboot it.'" (Dennis Ritchie) http://www.residuum.org/
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev