19 Oct
2012
19 Oct
'12
9:03 a.m.
On 10/19/2012 06:08 AM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Any objections? Shall I go with lazy consensus on this one?
.hc
On 10/16/2012 07:17 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Hey all,
I was tired of dealing with a cryptic ./configure, so I converted OSCx to be based on the Library Template. THis is currently in the pd-extended/0.43 branch.
Anyone have any objections of me removing the old OSCx and replacing it with the 'oscx' library?
why would you want to keep OSCx alive? i would rather entirely remove this buggy and un-maintained (as in: upstream, not within PdX) library from any distribution.
and i don't get the point of replacing "OSCx" by "oscx".
fgmadrs IOhannes