On 10/15/2015 10:40 PM, katja wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 9:47 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoelnig@iem.at wrote:
On 2015-10-14 21:59, katja wrote:
So you've imported all Pd libraries from svn into git, preserving commit history... great initiative IOhannes! And it is hosted by IEM, couldn't be better.
What is your idea, should all maintainers immediately stop committing to SVN, and fork their libraries to git repositories?
i think the idea is to let the devs choose. if someone prefers to work with svn, so be it. if somebody else prefers gi, then they have now a history-preserving base repo to fork from.
Just to check if I understand the idea correctly: will that base repo be a frozen snapshot of Pd-extended commit history, not updated with possible future commits to SVN?
let's put it like this: i hope to keep future maintainance of the checkouts at a bare minimum.
there are still a few things left undone (see [1]), which need fixing (even without future SVN commit).
since there are not so many svn commits these days, i think it should be easy enough to replay any future commits on top of the git-repositories (so all SHAs stay the same).
gfmdsar IOhannes